National Geographic Society

  • Connect:

What is the Wow! Signal?

Wow_signal2.jpg

Wow_signal2.jpg (View larger version)

By: Patrick J. Kiger

Published

Everyone remembers the Steven Spielberg’s 1977 classic sci-fi film “Close Encounters of the Third Kind,” which depicted an imagined first contact with an alien civilization. But most probably don’t realize that a few months before the movie came out,  real-life scientists believed—at least for a few exciting moments—that they might have detected an actual message sent by  extraterrestrials.

It was mid-August 1977, and across the U.S., many if not most people were focused on the shocking death of rock-and-roll great Elvis Presley at age 42. But in Ohio, a 37-year-old man named Jerry Ehman was transfixed by another startling event that—at least for searchers for extraterrestrial intelligence—potentially was even more momentous.

Ehman, a volunteer researcher for Ohio State University’s now-defunct Big Ear radio observatory, pebrused data from the telescope’s scan of the skies on August 15, a few days earlier. In those days, such information was run through an IBM 1130 mainframe computer and printed on perforated paper, and then laboriously examined by hand. But the tedium was shattered when Ehman spotted something surprising—a vertical column with the alphanumerical sequence “6EQUJ5,” which had occurred at 10:16 p.m. EST. He grabbed a red pen and circled the sequence. In the margin, wrote “Wow!”

Ehman’s excitement over that bit of arcane information stemmed from the Big Ear’s mission at the time, which was searching space for radio signals of the sort that might be emanated by extraterrestrial civilizations, if they were attempting to make contact with intelligent life elsewhere in the universe. To Ehman, this signal, which had come from the direction of the constellation Sagittarius, looked an awful lot like it could be such a message. Observatory director John Krauss and his assistant Bob Dixon, who subsequently examined the data, were similarly astonished by it.

But was it? More than three decades later, the Wow Signal, as it has come to be known to SETI researchers, remains both the first and best potential evidence of communication from extraterrestrials, and one of the most perplexing mysteries in science.  Over the years, Ehman and colleagues worked to rule out other explanations—such as satellites, aircraft or ground-based transmitters on Earth. But by the same token, researchers have yet to prove that it actually is message from space. “It’s an open question.” Ehman told the Columbus Dispatch in 2010. Or as the late science-fiction author Arthur C. Clarke once put it in a 1997 interview with New Scientist magazine, “God only knows what it was.”

To grasp the significance of the Wow Signal, it helps to understand what Ehman and his colleagues were looking for. Back in the early 1960s, Cornell physicists Philip Morrison and Guiseppe Cocconi had tried to figure out how a distant extraterrestrial civilization, if one existed, might try to contact others in the universe. First, they hypothesized, aliens would use a radio signal, since such transmissions require relatively little energy to generate and can travel huge distances across space. Second, they assumed that the aliens would be smart enough to pick a message that other intelligent species might understand, even if they spoke a very different language. Chemicals, they noted, emit distinctive electromagnetic frequencies, or signatures, which is how astronomers can determine the composition of distant planets and stars from their light. Since hydrogen, the most common element in the universe, emits a signal with a frequency of 1420 megahertz, they reasoned that aliens might send out a signal that mimicked it.

But the signal spotted by Ehman was the first that seemed to fit that description almost exactly.

Each digit on the printout represented the intensity of a radio signal, from zero to 35, with intensities over nine being represented by letters. Most of the signals on the printouts were ones and twos. But this one, as signified by the “U” in the middle, was extremely powerful—about 30 times greater than the ordinary ambient noise of deep space. Indeed, it was the loudest, longest signal that the Big Ear, which was shut down and dismantled in 1997, would ever pick up. And the signal was narrowly focused and extremely close to 1420 megahertz, the frequency of hydrogen. In contrast, natural sources of radiation, such as planets, usually send out a much broader range of frequencies.

While that all has seemed so tantalizing to SETI researchers, they’ve never been able to prove that the Wow Signal actually was such a message. And much about it was difficult to explain. Scientists also were puzzled when they traced the signal to a location northwest of the globular cluster M55—a spot where there apparently was no star or planet. SETI researcher Paul Shuch told New Scientist in 1997 that if the signal did come from an alien civilization, it would have required some amazingly advanced equipment. Assuming that the extraterrestrial beacon was the size of the biggest radio telescopes on Earth, the aliens would have required a 2.2 gigawatt transmitter, vastly more powerful than any existing terrestrial radio station.

But the most puzzling thing about the Wow Signal was that it lasted approximately 72 seconds, and never was detected again, even though in the 20 years that followed, scientists conducted more than 100 studies of the same region of sky. If aliens were trying to contact us, wouldn’t they keep repeating their message? Back in the early 2000s, researchers tried once more with a 26-meter radio telescope in Hobart, Tasmania, which was smaller than the Big Ear but more advanced technologically. Despite their ability to detect signals only five percent as strong as the Wow Signal, the Astrobiology Magazine reported in 2003 that they found nothing that resembled it.

11 comments
David Lee
David Lee

No rock, no grain of sand since the  Big bang has moved due to  ' Magical '  reasons, or explained by  natural phenomena.. Therefore if it was not an error or a rare natural quirk(phenomena)

Then somebody must have moved that rock!

A civilisation let slip their technology.--- 

Jaffet Cordoba
Jaffet Cordoba

Update to previous posting on facebook

Current WOW algorithm:

That was interesting. I did not know about the "WOW signal", discovered in OHIO, and which has not been collected since. If 6EQUJ5 is defining amplitude, maybe the opposite, 5JUQE6, is a matching binary: amplitude 1 is binary 1, and amplitude 2 is a binary 0. If you like computers, it certainly is entertaining to think about.

 {New 1103014: Our acknowledging response would be 5EQUJ6, indicating that we understand the code. The binary opposite of 0, returned as 1, or our response as YES.}

 And, of course, 72 seconds would be the expected simple, very simple, "check sum".

 Even thought about it some more last night. For example, maybe our supposed alien understands some human alphabet components. So, you could say "EQUJ" looks like "EQUAL". Now, a simple logic can be created: 6 EQUALS 5 is not true, or a logical zero. And the mirror phase would be the logical one. Again, a simple asynchronous communication stream can be created.

 {New 110314: This could also be interpreted, additionally, as 6 implies/implies-result 5 if 6 divides 30. By making note of this observation, the clue might link somewhere else. Let us call this CLUE-A.}

Or maybe you are selling James Cameron or Luc Besson a science fiction movie concept. You could claim our alien has visited us and seen horse like creatures ("all in the genus Equus").

So we could invent an extra-terrestrial message: "The message moves from 6 to 5", a 1 unit difference. Again, the mirror would be the logical zero.

Naturally, this all assumes our talented and crafty directors don't go snooping around and discover the whole thing is the work of some sophisticated radio telescope hacking by a prankster: you always have to be careful, if you can.

And now that the holiday is over, and maybe you are up to reading into things. How about 6 to 5, translated as 625, which is 25 squared, being the length of our transmission word, a binary word of 25 bits, in this case. So all of our responses would be 25 phase bits, followed by an asynchronous pause, and then followed by the next 25 phase bits, and so forth.

{New 103014: Additional, 5 square is 25, or five equal spaces for constructing an open box, and supposedly placing our message.}

 What if we are supposed demonstrate our ability to create a bundled logical construct? From our 25 phase bits, the first 3 bits can be used to generate the number 6 and the last 3 bits can be used to generate the number 5. The 25 bit word would look like this: [110] [19 symbol phase bits] [101]. Naturally, this might only make sense to aspiring high school programmers in computer studies.

 Not done yet: Notice that "J" is the tenth letter of this alphabet, or 10, implying the set {1,0}.

 {New 103014: So that now, if we math-close (Closure for addition) our open box, we can deduce 1 plus 9 is 10, achieving some measure affirmation for the 19 symbol content bits.}

 Also notice, EQU is a set of 3 letters, which fit nicely in the space of 19 symbol bits. So, this leaves us [11111] [11111] [11111] with 4 bits to spare. The word now breaks up as: [110] [11111] [11111] [11111] [4 spare bits] [101]. Of course, we build our message using the binary set symbols {1, 0}.

 {New 110314: Notice that we can write our expansion as:The container structure element [110] CLUE-A pointer [4 spare bits] [101] in an open box.}

 Ok, let's finish this up. This is getting near the end of my facebook page. The last remaining 4 bits, what about them? Well, let us just say our friend does not want messages greater than 15 words, which we can count with 4 bits. So send away, but only in 15 word or less phrases: welcome to the inter-galactic telegraph. Furthermore, we can bury our total word count for each phrase in each individual bit word sent -another simple way to check sum.

I have a little space left (pun). The numbers! You can imagine that they would map to letters A to I (remember J is 10). Ok, you are officially spun off and on your own.


Leslie Weller
Leslie Weller

If the signal is alien and is meant as a beacon (why else?), then they likely would be trying to signal every region in the sky. We know that the signal was narrow. Do we know how fast it passed us? If we knew both how narrow and how fast it passed, perhaps we could extrapolate how long it would take to cover every spot in the universe before repeating itself. I would then add that number to the time the signal first appeared to find the date that it might reappear and then start listening in a range around that date. www.wikipothesis.com

Andrew Huang
Andrew Huang

What if it is a Mayday signal from a passing spaceship and we happened to pick up?

Nasbc Price
Nasbc Price

what he picked up was the tail end of a signal that may have been transmitted by a civilisation with a technological capability similar to what we have today. After exhaustive tests and retests it has been proved that no man made signal could match the exact signal that was received, if that  signal was transmitted from within our own solar system. The reason why the signal is no longer present is because the entire signal has long passed our location in space. it could also be argued that the source of the signal came from a civilisation that was probing the sky and directing signals towards location they themselves though may contain life. In other words doing exactly what we are doing today. If the civilisation that sent the signal survived the progression in their technology, then the technology we are using today to detect signals from that part of the sky is obsolete. We need to be thinking ahead of our current technology and the use of radio signals. 

D D
D D

"If aliens were trying to contact us, wouldn’t they keep repeating their message?"  Umm, not necessarily.  How many repeating signals have WE tried sending out to a fixed spot over several months/years?

Steve Gray
Steve Gray

@Daniel Rolan God would probably make a signal unambiguous. Why would he keep us guessing? This idea undercuts every claim of Christianity.

Philippe Barbaux
Philippe Barbaux

@D D    !  : .. - qui nous dit qu'un tel signal s'adresserait bien à nous !? .. Entre nous découvrir et vouloir communiquer .. il y a bien un pas ! .. combien de fois envoyons nous donc entre 'nous' nos signaux .. et pour quelles motivations .. ou actions prévisibles ou 'imprévisibles' !? .. <