JFK The Lost Bullet
Mr. Stump Sr.~
I would like nothing better than to put the the whole issue to bed, and let the President rest in peace. I first need an esteemed explanation of why the second and third bullets behaved so inconsistently. Please tell me how a full-metal jacket bullet, as was used in Oswald's Carcano rifle, could implode upon impact (third bullet), rather than go thru-and-thru as it is designed to do, and as the second shot did?
Please explain the extraordinary inconsistency (explosion vs. thru-and-thru) in the behavior of the second and third bullets.
Did anyone else see the closeup of sixth floor figure in window wearing a bright yellow shirt or jacket? Oswald wore a light tan jacket to work found between cop shooting. 'Officer Tippet" and Texas theater. When he was arrested he was wearing dark plaid collar shirt and white "V" neck T-shirt.
To M. Stump. Have you ever shoot a mellon with a hollow point or soft nose bullet ? Just as much seeds and mellon comes out the front as the back. And a mellon doesn't have a skull made of bone. Don't forget Timelife had this film for 12 yrs. before it was released to public. Timelife had many CIA contract agents working for them and still do as well as many other media outlets.
You conspiracy theorist kill me. This guy used technology and eyewitness testimony to put together a great program. Yes, I do believe Oswald was following JFK in the scope to shoot and didn't see the traffic light and when he shot the first bullet it hit the light. Oswald's hand prints were all over the rifle and the boxes all around the window. Please put this to rest. Conspiracy is over. Get a life. NGC thanks for a great program.
The evidence that so many people overlook comes from the Dallas Police Department and the FBI, not the Zapruder Film. Oswald was given a wax paraffin test to check for traces of nitrates on his skin. Both his hands and his face were applied with paraffin. He tested positive on his hands, and NEGATIVE on his face. That evidence, all alone, in the hands of any capable team of attorneys, would have acquitted him of having fired a weapon that day. Anyone who has ever fired a rifle knows that you get blasted with gunpowder gases on your hands and face when you pull the trigger. But to test negative on his face? No. He didn't fire a rifle that day. As for the positive reaction on his hands, there was a handgun "found" on him when he was arrested. But he was also an amateur photographer who had a darkroom setup in his apartment. Nitrates, while found in gunpowder, are also found in photographic developing chemicals.
The FBI were handed the cheap "assassination" rifle to test for accuracy. What they had to do BEFORE they were EVER able to fire it with any degree of accuracy, was to remove the scope, insert a metal shim to raise the scope slightly, and reattach the scope. Only then were they able to hit what they were aiming at. In other words, the rifle was not in operational condition at the time of the shooting. Both of these pieces of evidence are documented, and listed in the Warren Commission Report, although they hid them deep within the 26 volumes, and are not in the abridged one volume edition.
what would be a perfect vechile for a show would be an allstar panel of medical experts to review not only autospy photo's and x rays but clothing witness testimony..how autospy photo's don't even match each other ..even witness testimony doesn't match each other.. those close to the book depository..say one shot followed by two quick shots ..those by the grassy knoll two shots followed by one shot..I'd love to be the host of this show to take it where ever it goes..if it proves oswald did fine..if it proves with otu a question that oswald couldn't have done ..that is good also..brian
The show the Lost Bullet was so one sided that it wasn't even funny..You want me to believe that a bullet fired suppossedly from Oswald hit a traffic light with the presidential car underneath and the secret service car not far behind..the sound of that would have been like a canon going off..What do we know, we know that both President Kennedy and John Connally react after frame 160..John Connally has turned to his right and President Kennedy is looking toward ..you guessed it ..the grassy knoll..we know that President Kennedy was hit at frame 189 for his arm shoots forward as if he were trying to throw a block..we see President Kennedy get hit again at frame 230 when his shoulders hunch up.. a natural human reaction when we are hit in the back ..we all do it..3 John Connally is hit by a seperate bullet around the same time as the second shot that hit the President..the reason for the confusion..the problem is that every one tries to tell the evidence what it says ..isntead of letting the evidence tell us.. As the writer of the film script on the kennedy assassination mwhich deals most with the medical evidence....brian squitti at Bsquitti@gmail.com
Matt, Take a deep breath. Listen carefully to the star witness Amos Euins audio cadence as he recounts 'in real time' his memory of the sounds that day: "POW (one one-thousand, two one-thousand, three) POW, POW. " There is no pause between the 2nd and third shots in Mr Euins mind.
In the show Max Holland himself says there are only two ways this is possible, "either there were two shooters or ..."
@brian squitti Grassy knoll is out of the question. Didn't you see JFK's side of his head get blown off from the bullet going from back to front? The blood spray even went forward. The HD film told a lot. If he was shot from the grassy knoll his head would not have looked like that and the blood wouldn't have blown forward as it did.
@brian squitti No grassy knoll. The people were running to the grassy knoll to get away from the shot. The HD video was more than enough to show where those shots came from. Put the conspiracy to rest. This program was eye opening.