National Geographic Society

  • Connect:

Channel

Do Parallel Universes Exist?

Parallel universes have haunted science fiction for decades, but a surprising number of top scientists believe they are real.

Info

Channel: Do Parallel Universes Exist?

Published

Parallel universes have haunted science fiction for decades, but a surprising number of top scientists believe they are real.

Share

4 comments
Louise Wyss
Louise Wyss

Food for thought. Why not possible? Think out of the box sometimes.

Penn Stallard
Penn Stallard

Big 

bang, as hard as is to fathom, is being proved.  It takes a while to find truths that have happened so long ago by our puny minds ... even the smartest among us.   However, some of the smartest fellows think there is a possibility of such a thing being possible.  Who are you Soviet person we know not who to say otherwise?  Your arguments seem specious.


Penn Stallard
Penn Stallard

Why no explanation from Stephen Hawking or Roger Penrose?

They know about this.


Георги Кънев
Георги Кънев

About multitude universe: Shown several points about supposition that “we live in multitude universe” is based upon non proofed physical categories such as “big bang” and “space-time” extension and building of the universe. The space-time building of the universe is non sensiblebecause of the following: ! All of us I believe know very well special theory of relativity and of course the general one, but these theories are correct about the time when they wеre invented by Einstein and especially if I may to use the word of Einstein himself (how it is possible of course), he very much doubt about the problem with the absolute space existence. He approximate said that if the space is distances between the objects only, that doesn’t obstruct the existence of the absolute space, and it for the time was correct. By then the essence of the field, that he accepted, it is the bending of the space only and these bending can organize through some tensor of deformations. For that the general theory of relativity needs absolute space, because the effect of memberis very weak if the velocity is between the two close objects. Einstein said the following: If we have one revolving disc and if we put tangentially on the periphery a meter length, then this meter will shrink according to the member above, but if we put this meter at the radius it remain the same. So if we divide the perimeter by the diameter of this disc we cannot obtain the number . That is why the space is bending, but to be possible this bending to explain the quantity of the gravitational field, there is needed velocity close to the velocity of light, which practically is very rarely on the Universe. So Einstein proposes the following experiment: He said if we have one flat table and if begin to arrange safety matches in square form and if we shifting a little one of them, the difference will be insignificant, but if we continues with the arrangement endlessly then the bending will be so big that the curvet line can close into the circuit. So Einstein is needs endless absolute space independently existing, where act the physical processes. The connections between the times, also is known, but there is importantly that the times to have common beginning. So let pass towards the theory USM www.kanevuniverse.com

Namely from part I and part II it is seen that the distances between the cell of the matter, which is the orbital system, is equilibrium between the centripetal and centrifugal forces and this movement creates the field itself: . So if these forces absent then the space disappears, because the field disappears and because of that the masses also disappear. So remains nothing, which (if You read the theory) passes into absolute nothing. So the absolute space doesn’t exist. Now about the times: If You read the theory You can see the coefficient of connection between the times in the two most close spaces, for instance Our space and Subspace, and this coefficient is equal to: folds. So when in our space passes one second in the subspace passes seconds. So in the subspace there are beginnings……. Where is the common beginning about the two times? Obviously the time in the USM is quantity of movement like multiplication between force (which means acceleration or the same field) and passed road and obviously the time it isn’t real dimension, but because of the thickening of the micro cosmos and expanding of the macro cosmos this quantity of movement does represent the energy and this coincides with the essence of the time in general theory of relativity. But let’s stop here because the lecture becomes very long. Other and many more in: www.kanevuniverse.com