Exotic Animal Incidents
A breakdown of the injuries and deaths caused by exotic animals and caused by humans owning exotic animals.
Burst into tears when it came to the part about that poor chained up circus elephant who was beaten with a BULLHOOK until she screamed. Sometimes I come across things like this when I'm doing my assignments and it seriously makes me consider whether I want to keep doing it; I just see more and more examples of the kind of abuse and torture some people put these animals through...
I agree with you, Craig. I feel like this article and these numbers are grossly unbalanced. I totally agree that wild animals are not for the average person. There are a lot of people out there that have no business owning a dog much less a wild animal. However, there are a lot of people that are suited for it, are responsible, willing and able. I say more power to them. Let's face it, the wild isn't getting any bigger. These animals numbers are not going to get better in the wild unless humans leave the planet, so at some point there won't be any wild for the animals to be in.
These statistics seem to be truly lacking and open ended. Itis widely known that statistics can be manipulated and misconstrued. Theopening statement itself is open to debate, what are the real numbers of tigersin captivity in the US?How many are in AZA zoos, in circuses, in licensed private zoos, as pets inhouseholds? What are the accurate numbers of tigers in the wild, even betweenconservation organizations these numbers vary widely.
From the very start these statistics are contorted to showownership of wild animals as a horrific travesty, while many of the incidentsspecifically mentioned are at large institutions, such as Sea World and otherAZA facilities. Some of these animal deaths are attributed to anesthesia orbeing euthanized by police after an incident with people and not caused by anywrongdoing from the owner. Where do these statistics come from, how accurateare the number of incidents, how comprehensive of a survey was done?
These statistics also fail to show the total numbers ofanimals in each of these categories that are owned. As an example, if therehave been 10,000 bears kept in captivity over the last 20 years then 4 human deathsdoesn't seem to be nearly as drastic a number. Without a reference of how manycaptive owned wild animals there are compared to how many have caused incidentsthen there is no scale to how problematic ownership of that type of animal is.
While these statistic here show incidents of wild animalskept in captivity, they don't show a true reference point for these numbers. 19 deaths to reptiles seems like a largenumber, but how many dangerous reptiles have been in captivity over the last 20years. In comparison how many injuries and deaths have been caused by "domesticated"animals. How many deaths and injuries can be attributed to horses orlarge breeds of dogs compared to the number that are in captivity. I can guarantyyou that more people are injured or killed by either of these domestic animalsin any given year than any of these wild animal categories.
The point of this comment is not to say that wild animalsare good pets, but to point out that statistics can be easily misconstrued.Question articles when you read them, what viewpoint are they pushing, whatinformation are they leaving out, how can they be misrepresenting information.All I can ask of people reading any inflammatory article is to take in the ALLof the facts from all sides before you decide your position. I do not think thatmost wild animals should be kept as pets, especially by untrainedindividuals, but facilities should not be lumped in the same box as householdpet owners. Individuals need to be treated just like that INDIVIDUALS. Anymoron with a horse, bull, or large dog could be as likely to be hurt, if notmore so, than an person owning a big cat or large constrictor.
What is the criteria for these statistics? One week? One month? According to the animal/police shows in Alaska, the moose does kill people every winter.
@Patty Kilgo Actually, there are hundreds of conservation projects going on worldwide. We can keep these animals alive, if it wasn't for the idiots that think a tiger or an elephant, for example, make good pets.
You are correct Craig, it would be helpful to have more data! How many exotic animals are kept in captivity, what species, etc., but unfortunately no one collects this data. Indeed eight states do not even require licensing or permits to own an exotic animal!
Furthermore, there are no requirements to report when an animal has attacked, escaped or died at licensed or non-licensed facilities, or in a private individual's backyard. So yes, this data only represents a tip of the iceberg. It is just a few of the worst or more sensational stories that actually make it into the news.
This data has been collected by Born Free USA since 1990 and is only a partial list because we can only track the incidents we hear about, usually through media reports and a few USDA inspection reports. This doesn't cover the potentially huge number of incidents in which someone is injured or a captive animal is harmed or killed but the incident does not make the news.
Sadly, one of the statistics we do know is that there are more tigers held in captivity than there are living freely in the wild. And that is something we hope will change for the better as a result of our sharing what we know about the tragic situations of keeping wild animals behind bars (both to the determent of the animals and people involved.).
Born Free USA promotes our viewpoint in our mission. We believe that people should work together to "Keep Wildlife in the Wild."
I agree with Craig that the data is not sufficient to make real comparisons. Also I have read posts elsewhere in which make the point that more people are killed or injured by dogs and other domestic animals. That is a comparison of two very different populations and you cannot calculate risk by simply looking at the raw numbers because there are many more domestic animals in the environment and people come into close contact with them much more often. You cannot calculate risk that way. A better way to do it is to break down the number of incidents per animal in the environment and from that calculate a comparative risk (i.e. what percent lesser or greater is the risk of being injured by a pet lion as opposed to a pet dog)
Unfortunately there isn’t enough data to really get those numbers.